SeeTraceAct: Visibility-Aware Latent Planning from Cross-Embodiment Demonstration Videos

Jaehyeon Son1,2 Junhyun Kim1 Kyle Kam1 Jeremiah Coholich1 Seok Joon Kim1 Jinhoo Kim1 Chris Dongjoo Kim2 Jaemin Cho2,3 Dieter Fox2,4 Zsolt Kira1

1Georgia Institute of Technology 2Allen Institute for AI 3Johns Hopkins University 4University of Washington

Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2026

Overview

Overview of SeeTraceAct: the policy observes a one-shot demonstration video, camera views, and a language instruction (See), predicts future end-effector traces and their visibility during training (Trace), and generates actions from the visual latent plan (Act).
  • SeeOne-shot demonstration video
  • TraceFuture gripper path and its visibility
  • ActGenerate robot actions

Abstract

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) are promising general-purpose robot policies, but adapting them to new tasks typically requires costly task-specific teleoperation data. As an alternative, we study one-shot demo-conditioned VLAs, where a robot policy is conditioned on a single demonstration video of an unseen task. We find that existing end-to-end approaches often struggle when successful execution requires precisely localizing small target regions. To address this limitation, we propose SeeTraceAct, a demo-conditioned VLA framework that encourages precise spatial grounding through visibility-aware prediction of future end-effector traces. To enable reproducible evaluation with cross-embodiment demonstrations, we introduce and release RoboCasa-DC, a demo-conditioned extension of RoboCasa that pairs its robot trajectories with newly collected humanoid demonstrations. Experiments on RoboCasa-DC and a real-world benchmark, where a Franka Panda arm is conditioned on human demonstrations, show that SeeTraceAct outperforms baselines, achieving the best success rate across all four RoboCasa-DC settings and improving real-world average success by 9.5 percentage points.

Method

Architecture of SeeTraceAct: camera views, a language instruction, and a demonstration video are encoded into a vision-language model; learnable query tokens form a visual latent plan that feeds a flow-matching action expert and, during training, a visibility-aware trace decoder with regression and validity heads.

1Video tokens

V-JEPA 2 encodes the demonstration video and a Perceiver Resampler compresses it into a compact set of tokens that join the VLM input.

2Visual latent plan

Learnable query tokens attend to the image, language, and video tokens. Their hidden states condition the action expert.

3Visibility-aware traces

The plan is decoded into future end-effector traces in each camera view. A validity head predicts whether each point is in frame, so off-screen points still carry a signal.

Training only. The trace decoder shapes the plan during training and is discarded at inference, so the deployed policy simply sees and acts.

RoboCasa-DC Benchmark

RoboCasa-DC cross-embodiment benchmark: for each of 24 tasks, 100 Panda-arm trajectories are paired with GR-1 humanoid demonstrations for training, and humanoid demonstrations are collected for 50 pre-defined evaluation seeds per task.

A demo-conditioned extension of RoboCasa: every Panda-arm trajectory is paired with a GR-1 humanoid demonstration.

24 kitchen tasks
100 Panda–humanoid demo pairs per task
50 evaluation seeds per task, each with its own demo

Two demo sources

  • Same-embodiment Panda-arm video
  • Cross-embodiment GR-1 humanoid video as a human proxy

Two evaluation splits

  • Category-balanced every task type
  • Precision-sensitive tasks with small target regions

Each split trains on 19 tasks and holds out 5 unseen ones.

Public release. RoboCasa-DC is available on Hugging Face.

Results

RoboCasa-DC Benchmark

Best success rate in all four settings, with the largest margin on the precision-sensitive cross-embodiment split.

Method Category-balanced split Precision-sensitive split
Same-emb demo Cross-emb demo Same-emb demo Cross-emb demo
Vid2Robot 17.9% 9.5% 11.4% 5.6%
UniSkill 13.0% 11.3% 11.7% 5.6%
ViVLA 14.1% 9.1% 8.8% 7.2%
SeeTraceAct (Ours) 18.9% 11.6% 13.2% 10.8%

Success rate over the five unseen tasks of each split, 50 episodes per task, averaged over three runs.

Real-World Benchmark

A Franka Panda arm conditioned on a single human video, trained on four tasks and tested on six unseen ones.

Real-world success rate per unseen task for Vid2Robot, UniSkill, ViVLA, and SeeTraceAct 0 20 40 60 80 Success rate (%) Vid2Robot · Pick Block: 53.3% 53.3 UniSkill · Pick Block: 56.7% 56.7 ViVLA · Pick Block: 63.3% 63.3 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Pick Block: 70.0% 70 Pick Block Vid2Robot · Pick Cup: 36.7% 36.7 UniSkill · Pick Cup: 60.0% 60 ViVLA · Pick Cup: 53.3% 53.3 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Pick Cup: 70.0% 70 Pick Cup Vid2Robot · Press Button: 30.0% 30 UniSkill · Press Button: 26.7% 26.7 ViVLA · Press Button: 16.7% 16.7 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Press Button: 40.0% 40 Press Button Vid2Robot · Stack Blocks in Swapped Order: 3.3% 3.3 UniSkill · Stack Blocks in Swapped Order: 6.7% 6.7 ViVLA · Stack Blocks in Swapped Order: 6.7% 6.7 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Stack Blocks in Swapped Order: 10.0% 10 Stack Blocks (Swapped Order) Vid2Robot · Place Block in Bin: 6.7% 6.7 UniSkill · Place Block in Bin: 0.0% 0 ViVLA · Place Block in Bin: 13.3% 13.3 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Place Block in Bin: 13.3% 13.3 Place Block in Bin Vid2Robot · Close Kettle Lid: 53.3% 53.3 UniSkill · Close Kettle Lid: 50.0% 50 ViVLA · Close Kettle Lid: 16.7% 16.7 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Close Kettle Lid: 53.3% 53.3 Close Kettle Lid Vid2Robot · Average: 30.6% 30.6 UniSkill · Average: 33.3% 33.3 ViVLA · Average: 28.3% 28.3 SeeTraceAct (Ours) · Average: 42.8% 42.8 Average

Success rate over 10 trials per task, averaged over three runs. SeeTraceAct matches or beats every baseline on every task.

What each piece contributes

SeeTraceAct (Ours) 11.2%
SeeTraceAct variants
3D traces instead of 2D image-space traces 9.7%
No trace supervision 9.3%
Trace the demonstrator instead of the robot 8.7%
No validity head 8.6%
SigLIP instead of the V-JEPA 2 video encoder 8.1%
Without a demonstration video
GR00T N1.5 backbone + trace supervision 9.0%
GR00T N1.5 backbone 8.5%

Demos and traces work together

Dropping either the demonstration video or trace supervision falls well short of the full model. Neither is enough on its own.

Visibility awareness matters

Without the validity head, success drops below even having no trace supervision. Regressing off-screen points hurts.

Simple 2D traces win

Image-space traces of the robot beat 3D traces and demonstrator traces.

Gains grow as the target shrinks

Trained on all 24 RoboCasa-DC tasks, SeeTraceAct's gain over the strongest baseline grows as the target region shrinks.

Gain of SeeTraceAct over ViVLA on each of the 24 RoboCasa-DC tasks, plotted against target interaction ratio -20 -10 0 +10 +20 0.1% 1% 10% Target region, % of camera view (log scale) ↑ SeeTraceAct better Less precision-sensitive → Gain over ViVLA (pp) Turn on stove Close double door Open double door

Citation

@inproceedings{son2026seetraceact,
  title     = {SeeTraceAct: Visibility-Aware Latent Planning from Cross-Embodiment Demonstration Videos},
  author    = {Son, Jaehyeon and Kim, Junhyun and Kam, Kyle and Coholich, Jeremiah and Kim, Seok Joon and Kim, Jinhoo and Kim, Chris Dongjoo and Cho, Jaemin and Fox, Dieter and Kira, Zsolt},
  booktitle = {Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL)},
  year      = {2026}
}